A common misconception about radiocarbon dating is that it gives a precise date B. In actual practice radiocarbon dating can only give a range of dates for a given sample to B. The precision of a radiocarbon date tells how narrow the range of dates is. There are two main factors which determine the precision of a radiocarbon date. Modern accelerator mass spectrometry used for radiocarbon dating purposes to separate radiocarbon atoms from stable carbon atoms and count them is quite precise.
Particularly for older samples, it may be useful to enrich the amount of 14 C in the sample before testing. This can be done with a thermal diffusion column. Once contamination has been removed, samples must be converted to a form suitable for the measuring technology to be used. For accelerator mass spectrometrysolid graphite targets are the most common, although gaseous CO 2 can also be used.
The quantity of material needed for testing depends on the sample type and the technology being used. There are two types of testing technology: detectors that record radioactivity, known as beta counters, and accelerator mass spectrometers. For beta counters, a sample weighing at least 10 grams 0.
For decades after Libby performed the first radiocarbon dating experiments, the only way to measure the 14 C in a sample was to detect the radioactive decay of individual carbon atoms. Libby's first detector was a Geiger counter of his own design. He converted the carbon in his sample to lamp black soot and coated the inner surface of a cylinder with it. This cylinder was inserted into the counter in such a way that the counting wire was inside the sample cylinder, in order that there should be no material between the sample and the wire.
Libby's method was soon superseded by gas proportional counterswhich were less affected by bomb carbon the additional 14 C created by nuclear weapons testing. These counters record bursts of ionization caused by the beta particles emitted by the decaying 14 C atoms; the bursts are proportional to the energy of the particle, so other sources of ionization, such as background radiation, can be identified and ignored.
The counters are surrounded by lead or steel shielding, to eliminate background radiation and to reduce the incidence of cosmic rays.
In addition, anticoincidence detectors are used; these record events outside the counter and any event recorded simultaneously both inside and outside the counter is regarded as an extraneous event and ignored. The other common technology used for measuring 14 C activity is liquid scintillation counting, which was invented inbut which had to wait until the early s, when efficient methods of benzene synthesis were developed, to become competitive with gas counting; after liquid counters became the more common technology choice for newly constructed dating laboratories.
The counters work by detecting flashes of light caused by the beta particles emitted by 14 C as they interact with a fluorescing agent added to the benzene. Like gas counters, liquid scintillation counters require shielding and anticoincidence counters.
For both the gas proportional counter and liquid scintillation counter, what is measured is the number of beta particles detected in a given time period.
Tree ring dating (dendrochronology) has been used in an attempt to extend the calibration of the calibration of carbon dating earlier than historical records allow, but this depends on temporal placement of fragments of wood (from long dead trees) using carbon dating, assuming straight-line extrapolation backwards. Oct 18, The carbon clock is getting reset. Climate records from a Japanese lake are set to improve the accuracy of the dating technique, which could help to shed light on archaeological mysteries such as Author: Nature Magazine. In order for carbon dating to be accurate, we must know what the ratio of carbon to carbon was in the environment in which our specimen lived during its lifetime. Unfortunately the ratio of carbon to carbon has yet to reach a state of equilibrium in our atmosphere; there is more carbon in the air today than there was thousands of.
This provides a value for the background radiation, which must be subtracted from the measured activity of the sample being dated to get the activity attributable solely to that sample's 14 C. In addition, a sample with a standard activity is measured, to provide a baseline for comparison. The ions are accelerated and passed through a stripper, which removes several electrons so that the ions emerge with a positive charge.
A particle detector then records the number of ions detected in the 14 C stream, but since the volume of 12 C and 13 Cneeded for calibration is too great for individual ion detection, counts are determined by measuring the electric current created in a Faraday cup. Any 14 C signal from the machine background blank is likely to be caused either by beams of ions that have not followed the expected path inside the detector or by carbon hydrides such as 12 CH 2 or 13 CH.
A 14 C signal from the process blank measures the amount of contamination introduced during the preparation of the sample. These measurements are used in the subsequent calculation of the age of the sample.
Why Carbon Dating Might Be in Danger
The calculations to be performed on the measurements taken depend on the technology used, since beta counters measure the sample's radioactivity whereas AMS determines the ratio of the three different carbon isotopes in the sample. To determine the age of a sample whose activity has been measured by beta counting, the ratio of its activity to the activity of the standard must be found.
To determine this, a blank sample of old, or dead, carbon is measured, and a sample of known activity is measured. The additional samples allow errors such as background radiation and systematic errors in the laboratory setup to be detected and corrected for. The results from AMS testing are in the form of ratios of 12 C13 Cand 14 Cwhich are used to calculate Fm, the "fraction modern".
Both beta counting and AMS results have to be corrected for fractionation. The calculation uses 8, the mean-life derived from Libby's half-life of 5, years, not 8, the mean-life derived from the more accurate modern value of 5, years. Libby's value for the half-life is used to maintain consistency with early radiocarbon testing results; calibration curves include a correction for this, so the accuracy of final reported calendar ages is assured.
The reliability of the results can be improved by lengthening the testing time. Radiocarbon dating is generally limited to dating samples no more than 50, years old, as samples older than that have insufficient 14 C to be measurable. Older dates have been obtained by using special sample preparation techniques, large samples, and very long measurement times. These techniques can allow measurement of dates up to 60, and in some cases up to 75, years before the present.
This was demonstrated in by an experiment run by the British Museum radiocarbon laboratory, in which weekly measurements were taken on the same sample for six months. The measurements included one with a range from about to about years ago, and another with a range from about to about Errors in procedure can also lead to errors in the results.
The calculations given above produce dates in radiocarbon years: i. To produce a curve that can be used to relate calendar years to radiocarbon years, a sequence of securely dated samples is needed which can be tested to determine their radiocarbon age. The study of tree rings led to the first such sequence: individual pieces of wood show characteristic sequences of rings that vary in thickness because of environmental factors such as the amount of rainfall in a given year.
These factors affect all trees in an area, so examining tree-ring sequences from old wood allows the identification of overlapping sequences. In this way, an uninterrupted sequence of tree rings can be extended far into the past. The first such published sequence, based on bristlecone pine tree rings, was created by Wesley Ferguson.
Suess said he drew the line showing the wiggles by "cosmic schwung ", by which he meant that the variations were caused by extraterrestrial forces. It was unclear for some time whether the wiggles were real or not, but they are now well-established.
A calibration curve is used by taking the radiocarbon date reported by a laboratory and reading across from that date on the vertical axis of the graph. The point where this horizontal line intersects the curve will give the calendar age of the sample on the horizontal axis. This is the reverse of the way the curve is constructed: a point on the graph is derived from a sample of known age, such as a tree ring; when it is tested, the resulting radiocarbon age gives a data point for the graph.
Over the next thirty years many calibration curves were published using a variety of methods and statistical approaches. The improvements to these curves are based on new data gathered from tree rings, varvescoralplant macrofossilsspeleothemsand foraminifera. The INTCAL13 data includes separate curves for the northern and southern hemispheres, as they differ systematically because of the hemisphere effect.
The southern curve SHCAL13 is based on independent data where possible and derived from the northern curve by adding the average offset for the southern hemisphere where no direct data was available.
The sequence can be compared to the calibration curve and the best match to the sequence established.
Carbon dating precision
Bayesian statistical techniques can be applied when there are several radiocarbon dates to be calibrated. For example, if a series of radiocarbon dates is taken from different levels in a stratigraphic sequence, Bayesian analysis can be used to evaluate dates which are outliers and can calculate improved probability distributions, based on the prior information that the sequence should be ordered in time.
Several formats for citing radiocarbon results have been used since the first samples were dated. As ofthe standard format required by the journal Radiocarbon is as follows. Related forms are sometimes used: for example, "10 ka BP" means 10, radiocarbon years before present i.
Calibrated dates should also identify any programs, such as OxCal, used to perform the calibration. A key concept in interpreting radiocarbon dates is archaeological association : what is the true relationship between two or more objects at an archaeological site? It frequently happens that a sample for radiocarbon dating can be taken directly from the object of interest, but there are also many cases where this is not possible.
Metal grave goods, for example, cannot be radiocarbon dated, but they may be found in a grave with a coffin, charcoal, or other material which can be assumed to have been deposited at the same time. In these cases, a date for the coffin or charcoal is indicative of the date of deposition of the grave goods, because of the direct functional relationship between the two.
There are also cases where there is no functional relationship, but the association is reasonably strong: for example, a layer of charcoal in a rubbish pit provides a date which has a relationship to the rubbish pit.
Contamination is of particular concern when dating very old material obtained from archaeological excavations and great care is needed in the specimen selection and preparation. InThomas Higham and co-workers suggested that many of the dates published for Neanderthal artefacts are too recent because of contamination by "young carbon". As a tree grows, only the outermost tree ring exchanges carbon with its environment, so the age measured for a wood sample depends on where the sample is taken from.
This means that radiocarbon dates on wood samples can be older than the date at which the tree was felled. In addition, if a piece of wood is used for multiple purposes, there may be a significant delay between the felling of the tree and the final use in the context in which it is found.
Another example is driftwood, which may be used as construction material. It is not always possible to recognize re-use. Other materials can present the same problem: for example, bitumen is known to have been used by some Neolithic communities to waterproof baskets; the bitumen's radiocarbon age will be greater than is measurable by the laboratory, regardless of the actual age of the context, so testing the basket material will give a misleading age if care is not taken.
A separate issue, related to re-use, is that of lengthy use, or delayed deposition. For example, a wooden object that remains in use for a lengthy period will have an apparent age greater than the actual age of the context in which it is deposited.
Archaeology is not the only field to make use of radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon dates can also be used in geology, sedimentology, and lake studies, for example. The ability to date minute samples using AMS has meant that palaeobotanists and palaeoclimatologists can use radiocarbon dating directly on pollen purified from sediment sequences, or on small quantities of plant material or charcoal.
Dates on organic material recovered from strata of interest can be used to correlate strata in different locations that appear to be similar on geological grounds. Dating material from one location gives date information about the other location, and the dates are also used to place strata in the overall geological timeline.
Support Science Journalism
Radiocarbon is also used to date carbon released from ecosystems, particularly to monitor the release of old carbon that was previously stored in soils as a result of human disturbance or climate change. The Pleistocene is a geological epoch that began about 2. The Holocenethe current geological epoch, begins about 11, years ago when the Pleistocene ends.
Before the advent of radiocarbon dating, the fossilized trees had been dated by correlating sequences of annually deposited layers of sediment at Two Creeks with sequences in Scandinavia. The pastoral Neolithic of East Africa. Journal of World Prehistory, 5 Bowman, S. Re-evaluation of British Museum radiocarbon dates issued between and Radiocarbon, 32 1 Brock, F. Radiocarbon, 52 1- Radiocarbon, 54- Bronk Ramsey, C.
Radiocarbon dating: Revolutions in understanding. Archaeometry, 50 2- Calibration for archaeological and environmental terrestrial samples in the time range ka cal BP. Radiocarbon, 55 4- Chappell, J.
Some effects of partial recrystallisation on 14C dating Late Pleistocene corals and molluscs. Quaternary Research, 2 2- Chen, Y. Validity of 14C ages of carbonates in sediments. Clist, B. Journal of African Archaeology, 10 1 Close, A. Current research and recent radiocarbon dates from northern Africa, III. The Journal of African History, 29 02- Cohen, A. Lake level and paleoenvironmental history of Lake Tanganyika, Africa, as inferred from late Holocene and modern stromatolites.
Geological Society of America Bulletin, 4- Collett, D. Problems in the interpretation of radiocarbon dates: The pastoral Neolithic of East Africa. African Archaeological Review, 1 Cook, G. Radiocarbon43 Article- Problems of dating human bones from the Iron Gates. Antiquity, 76 Courtney Mustaphi, C. A database of radiocarbon dates for palaeoenvironmental research in eastern Africa. Open Quaternary, 23. Creel, D. Radiocarbon dating of corn.
American Antiquity, 51 4- Dal Sasso, G. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, Ethnic differences in use value and use patterns of baobab Adansonia digitata L. African Journal of Ecology, 47 3- Evaluation of possible contamination sources in the 14C analysis of bone samples by FTIR spectroscopy.
Radiocarbon, 49 2- Abrupt onset and termination of the African Humid Period: Rapid climate responses to gradual insolation forcing.
Quaternary Science Reviews, 19- Dewar, G. The Holocene, 22 12- Driessens, F. Ehret, C. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia. Bantu expansions: Re-envisioning a central problem of early African history. Forman, S. Variations in water level for Lake Turkana in the past years near Mt. Quaternary Science Reviews, 97 Freundlich, J. Radiocarbon dating of ostrich eggshells.
Radiocarbon, 31 3- Gasse, F. Hydrological changes in the African tropics since the Last Glacial Maximum. Gauthier, C.
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 9 8Q Geyh, M. Radiocarbon dating problems using acetylene as counting gas. Radiocarbon, 32 2- Goslar, T.
Contamination studies on mollusk shell samples. Radiocarbon, 27 1 Halfman, J. Fossil diatoms and the mid to late Holocene paleolimnology of Lake Turkana, Kenya: A reconnaissance study.
Journal of Paleolimnology, 7 1 Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, Haynes, C. Holocene palaeoecology of the eastern Sahara; Selima Oasis. Quaternary Science Reviews, 8- Hedges, R. Bone diagenesis: An overview of processes. Archaeometry, 44 3- Higham, T.
European Middle and Upper Palaeolithic radiocarbon dates are often older than they look: Problems with previous dates and some remedies. Antiquity, 85- AMS radiocarbon dating of ancient bone using ultrafiltration. Radiocarbon, 48 2 Hird, K. Contrasting diagenesis of two carboniferous oolites from South Wales: A tale of climatic influence.
Sedimentology, 35 4- Hodder, I. The distribution of material culture: Items in the Baringo District, western Kenya. Man, 12 2- Hollund, H. Archaeometry, 55 3- Hua, Q. Large variations in the Holocene marine radiocarbon reservoir effect reflect ocean circulation and climatic changes. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, SoilData V. International Study Group.
An inter-laboratory comparison of radiocarbon measurements in tree rings. Jain, S.
Microstructure, crystallography and diagenetic alteration in fossil ostrich eggshells from Upper Palaeolithic sites of Indian peninsular region. Micron, 84 Jans, M. Microbial bioerosion of bone-A review.
Tapanila Eds. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Janz, L. Dating surface assemblages using pottery and eggshell: Assessing radiocarbon and luminescence techniques in Northeast Asia. Journal of Archaeological Science, 57- Jull, A.
Radiocarbon dating, reservoir effects, and calibration. Quaternary International, Kazimierz, R. Radiocarbon, 34- Keeling, C. The Suess effect: 13CarbonCarbon interrelations. Environment International, 2 4- Killick, D. Review essay. What do we know about African iron working? Journal of African Archaeology, 2 1 Reassessment of the evidence for early metallurgy in Niger, West Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science, 15 4- Kim, J. AMS dates from two archaeological sites of Korea: Blind tests.
Radiocarbon, 58 1- Kromer, B. CO 2 gas proportional counting in radiocarbon dating-Review and perspective. Taylor, A. Kra Eds. New York: Springer. Kusimba, C. Mosaics and interactions: East Africa, BP to the present. Stahl Ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Lane, P. Antiquity, 81 1 Lawal, B. Dating problems at Igbo-Ukwu. Journal of African History, 14 1 Lebon, M. New parameters for the characterization of diagenetic alterations and heat-induced changes of fossil bone mineral using Fourier transform infrared spectrometry.
Journal of Archaeological Science, 37 9- Lee-Thorp, J. On isotopes and old bones. Archaeometry, 50 6- Lehto, J. Chemistry and analysis of radionuclides: Laboratory techniques and methodology. Chemical compositional changes in archaeological human bones due to diagenesis: Type of bone vs soil environment. Journal of Archaeological Science, 67 Marom, A.
Hydroxyproline dating: Experiments on the 14C analysis of contaminated and low-collagen bones. Radiocarbon, 55- Marty, J. Radiocarbon dating suitability of aquatic plant macrofossils. Journal of Paleolimnology, 52 4- Maurer, A.
Bone diagenesis in arid environments: An intra-skeletal approach. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, Mitchell, P. The archaeology of southernmost Africa from c.
Journal of African History, 46 2- Mollenhauer, G. Aging of marine organic matter during cross-shelf lateral transport in the Benguela upwelling system revealed by compound-specific radiocarbon dating. GeochemistryGeophysicsGeosystems8 9 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Coastal Currents.
Accessed 24 Nov Neulieb, T. Potential pitfalls of pollen dating. Nkana, Z. Olsen, J. Dietary habits and freshwater reservoir effects in bones from a Neolithic NE German cemetery.
Radiocarbon, 52 3 Pachur, H. Late Quaternary palaeoecology and palaeoclimates of the eastern Sahara. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 30 4- Patrut, A.
Age determination of large live trees with inner cavities: Radiocarbon dating of Platland tree, a giant African baobab.
Annals of Forest Science, 68 5- African baobabs with false inner cavities: The radiocarbon investigation of the Lebombo Eco Trail baobab. PloS One, 10 1e Philippsen, B.
In actual practice radiocarbon dating can only give a range of dates for a given sample to B.C., for examplethe true date lying somewhere in that range. The precision of a radiocarbon date tells how narrow the range of dates is. There are two main factors which determine the precision of a radiocarbon date. 1. Jun 06, Carbon dating accuracy called into question after major flaw discovery the field of archaeology on its head with the claim that there could be a number of inaccuracies in commonly accepted. Jun 30, The application of radiocarbon dating to determine the geochronology of archaeological sites is ubiquitous across the African continent. Accelerator mass spectrometry has made radiocarbon dating the most precise method to determine the death of living organisms that occurred within the last 50, years. However, the method is not without limitations and Cited by: 8.
The freshwater reservoir effect in radiocarbon dating. Heritage Science, 1 11- Phillipson, D. Language and farming dispersals in sub-Saharan Africa, with particular reference to the Bantu-speaking peoples.
Renfrew Eds. African archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Polach, H. Evaluation and status of liquid scintillation counting for radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon, 29 11- Four decades of progress in 14C dating by liquid scintillation counting and spectrometry. Rapp, G. Geoarchaeology 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press. Reimer, P.
Radiocarbon, 46- Discussion: Reporting and calibration of post-bomb 14 C data. Radiocarbon, 46 3- IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curvesyears cal BP. Rick, T. Journal of Archaeological Science, 32 11- Schiffer, M. Hohokam chronology: An essay on history and method. Schiffer Eds. New York: Academic Press. Journal of Archaeological Science, 13 1 Schmidt, M.
Radiocarbon dating New Zealand prehistory using marine shell.
BAR International Series Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. Accelerator mass spectrometers need only as little as 20 milligrams and as high as milligrams for certain samples whereas conventional methods need at least 10 grams in samples like wood and charcoal and as much as grams in bones and sediments.
Accelerator mass spectrometers typically need sample sizes lesser than conventional methods by a factor of 1, Radiocarbon dating is a destructive process.
Hence, because of its ability to analyze samples even in minute amounts, accelerator mass spectrometry is the method of choice for archaeologists with small artifacts and those who cannot destroy very expensive or rare materials. Due to the sensitivity of accelerator mass spectrometers, carbon dating small particles like blood particles, a grain, or a seed have been made possible.
Accelerator mass spectrometry also takes less time to analyze samples for carbon 14 content compared to radiometric dating methods that can take one or two days. An accelerator mass spectrometer has a run time of a few hours per sample. Lastly, it must be noted that AMS measurements usually achieve higher precision and lower backgrounds than radiometric dating methods.
An accelerator mass spectrometer, although a powerful tool, is also a costly one. Establishing and maintaining an accelerator mass spectrometer costs millions of dollars. Due to the small sample sizes involved, control of contaminants is also difficult. Rigorous pretreatment is needed to make sure contaminants have been eliminated and will not lead to substantial errors during the carbon dating process. Accelerator mass spectrometers are also used in pharmacokinetics, metabolite profiling, toxicology, and microdosing.
AMS is used to determine the natural abundance levels of carbon 14 in oceans as well as to carbon date sedimentary deposits. Accelerator mass spectrometry was used in building a three-dimensional map of carbon 14 distribution in dissolved inorganic carbon.